![]() She shows how the Panthers' members interpreted, implemented, and influenced party ideology and programs initiated dialogues about gender politics highlighted ambiguities in the Panthers' armed stance and criticized organizational priorities. Challenging the belief that the Panthers were a projection of the leadership, Spencer draws on interviews with rank-and-file members, FBI files, and archival materials to examine the impact the organization's internal politics and COINTELPRO's political repression had on its evolution and dissolution. Spencer traces the Black Panther Party's organizational evolution in Oakland, California, where hundreds of young people came to political awareness and journeyed to adulthood as members. Our focus on the IYI, OCS and OCLC spans the 1971-1982 time frame of BPP history and presents the case for the need to continue exploring BPP activism beyond 1974. By looking at the lives of individual males and exploring the educational and community spaces they occupied and worked within, we shed light on individuals who had a tremendous impact on the lives of BPP members and broader communities, both nationally and internationally. The authors utilize a range of primary and secondary sources, including oral interviews and unpublished photographs, to present a nuanced history of men in the BPP. The article also explores BPP men’s activities in various spaces such as the Intercommunal Youth Institute (IYI)/Oakland Community School (OCS), the Oakland Community Learning Center (OCLC), and the BPP newspaper, in particular, and their activist involvement in the broader community. Reshaping a dominant narrative of men in the BPP as hypermasculine violent figures, this essay centers on male members who are often overlooked, including John Huggins, Emory Douglas, Austin Allen, and Steve McCutchen. Popular media images throughout decades have distorted the complete reality of who many BPP male members were and strove to be: community activists, teachers, and caretakers. A large percentage of them were husbands, fathers, brothers, and friends. Indeed, a clear and undeniable argument can be made that men in the BPP have been presented in an incomplete light because they were more than angry activists. Women at one time formed a large portion of the BPP and many members had children while they were in the BPP. Historical research already has disproven that the BPP was all male and all angry. Davis persisted in contesting on a world stage America’s Cold War claims of democratic moral superiority and traveled to the Soviet Union to thank leaders for helping spearhead the international campaign that she credited for saving her life.The mention of three words, “Black Panther Party,” (BPP) continues to evoke mental images of black berets, black leather jackets, black shades and black men with scowling black faces. After an all-white jury acquitted Davis of all criminal charges, the mainstream press hailed the acquittal as evidence not of Davis’s innocence but as proof that she was wrong about America. democracy and of Davis’s concomitant guilt. They racialized Davis as a “black militant,” invoking traditional sexist–racist tropes of black women as emotionally unstable, sexual sirens, in order to reassure the American public of the righteousness of U.S. leaders and mainstream journalists dismissed the veracity of such claims, ridiculed Davis’s fears for her safety, and asserted that political trials and racism existed only “over there” in the communist universe. Davis, her family, and legal team insisted that racism and politics motivated the criminal charges against her and that a transnational movement was imperative to ensuring her safety as a black woman communist in the American justice system. It demonstrates that the life of this young black female intellectual in post-civil rights America became inseparable from securing (or contesting) the dominant narrative of U.S. This essay explores the arrest, imprisonment, and trial of Angela Davis as the most politically charged legal defense case of the détente era of the Cold War that drew international attention over a nearly two-year period (1970–72). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |